Search Engines and Press Archives between Memory and Oblivion

34 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2019

See all articles by Irini Katsirea

Irini Katsirea

Department of Journalism Studies, University of Sheffield

Date Written: February 14, 2017

Abstract

Search engines’ comprehensive digital memory has led to a desire for greater informational self-determination. The seminal judgment in Google Spain gave impetus to the development of data protection law as the preferred legal remedy for claimants who seek to erase their digital past. This article argues that the ‘right to be forgotten’ is a contourless and ill-conceived right, which can apply to a variety of markedly dissimilar cases, while paying insufficient regard to the fundamental rights of search engine users, website publishers and of the search engines themselves. Even though the decoupling of names from search results does not interfere with the original expression, it is intended to suppress this expression by drastically reducing its findability and hence its significance in the digital age. Search engines, with their intransparent modus operandi, are entrusted to unravel the Gordian knot between data protection and freedom of expression. But as the ‘right to be forgotten’ begins to cast its overly broad net over press archives, the Gordian knot risks tightening further.

Keywords: Data protection; privacy; freedom of expression; search engines; press archives; right to be forgotten; rehabilitation of offenders

Suggested Citation

Katsirea, Irini, Search Engines and Press Archives between Memory and Oblivion (February 14, 2017). European Public Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000952

Irini Katsirea (Contact Author)

Department of Journalism Studies, University of Sheffield ( email )

17 Mappin Street
Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DT
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
611
rank
280,403
PlumX Metrics