Prior Restraints and Digital Surveillance: The Constitutionality of Gag Orders Issued Under the Stored Communications Act

29 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2017 Last revised: 19 Jan 2018

Al-Amyn Sumar

Ballard Spahr LLP

Date Written: January 18, 2018

Abstract

The First Amendment’s prohibition on prior restraints on speech is generally understood to be near-absolute. The doctrine permits prior restraints in only a handful of circumstances, and tends to require compelling evidence of their necessity. The focus of this Article is the source of an unexpected but important challenge to this doctrine: government surveillance in the digital age. Recent litigation about the constitutionality of the Stored Communications Act (SCA) highlights that challenge. The SCA authorizes the government both to obtain a person’s stored internet communications from a service provider and to seek a gag order preventing the provider from even notifying the person of that fact. Though the government did not ultimately prevail in the litigation, the case provides a renewed opportunity to consider the tension between prior restraint doctrine and the government’s digital surveillance efforts.

This Article does that, offering three arguments. First, gag orders issued under the SCA ought to be treated like classic prior restraints that are valid in all but the rarest of cases. Second, the SCA cannot pass constitutional muster even under a more traditional strict scrutiny standard. Third, and independently, the procedure that the statute creates for obtaining a gag order is constitutionally deficient. In a concluding section, the Article considers the government’s revised stance on SCA gag orders, and suggests an alternative construction of the statute that may avoid constitutional problems.

Keywords: Prior Restraint Doctrine, First Amendment, Stored Communications Act, National Security Letters

Suggested Citation

Sumar, Al-Amyn, Prior Restraints and Digital Surveillance: The Constitutionality of Gag Orders Issued Under the Stored Communications Act (January 18, 2018). 20 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 74. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002608

Al-Amyn Sumar (Contact Author)

Ballard Spahr LLP ( email )

1675 Broadway
19th Floor
New York, NY 10019
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
491
PlumX