Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Autonomy Hierarchy

48 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2017  

Meghan Boone

Wake Forest University School of Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

The Supreme Court decided two cases in Spring 2015 – Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. and EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. – under Title VII. The plaintiffs in both cases believed that they had been discriminated against by their employers because they were members of a protected class – pregnant women in the former and religious believers in the latter. Both plaintiffs were seeking minor modifications to workplace policies as an accommodation. And in both opinions, handed down within a few months of each other, the Court used the language of favoritism to discuss whether the plaintiffs should prevail and what analysis should be employed. The manner in which the Court used the language of favoritism, however, could not have been more different. In the case of pregnancy, the Court soundly rejected that pregnant employees were entitled to any favored treatment, bending over backwards to avoid a ruling that pregnant employees were part of a “most favored” class. In the case of religion, the Court took the exact opposite approach, declaring that religious plaintiffs enjoyed “favored treatment.” This is despite the fact that Title VII provides no explicit textual support for such a distinction. In the absence of such a statutory explanation, what is really behind this difference in approach? This paper explores one potential answer to this question – that these decisions reflect the Court’s underlying belief in the paramount importance of the right to spiritual autonomy over and above the importance of a right to physical autonomy. Further, it explores how allowing such a hierarchy between a right to spiritual autonomy on the one hand and a right to physical autonomy on the other, to animate judicial decisions is both inherently gendered and has the effect of disproportionately harming women. It concludes by analyzing whether such a hierarchy of rights is reflective of lived experience and discussing possible alternative frameworks for analyzing such claims.

Keywords: Employment, Religious Discrimination, Pregnancy Discrimination, Feminist Legal Theory

Suggested Citation

Boone, Meghan, The Autonomy Hierarchy (2016). Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2016; Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3006603

Meghan Boone (Contact Author)

Wake Forest University School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.wfu.edu/faculty/profile/boonemm/

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
139