The Uncertain Trend in U.S. GDP
28 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 1997
Date Written: January 14, 1997
Abstract
Several recent papers conclude that U.S. real GDP is trend stationary, implying that all shocks are transitory and the long run path is deterministic. These inferences fail to take into account two problems: the distortion of test size in finite samples due to data-based model selection and the fragility of unit root tests in the face of plausible departures from the maintained hypothesis of temporal homogeneity. Indeed, additive outliers that alter the level of output for only one period reliably trigger false rejections of the unit root hypothesis when it is true and signal the presence of permanent shifts in trend that did not occur. Trend stationarity is not supported by the more homogeneous post-war data and if imposed would imply business cycles of implausible duration and pattern--the economy was 8% below the trend line in 1994.
JEL Classification: C22, E32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Temporal Aggregation and the Power of Cointegration Tests: A Monte Carlo Study
-
Restricted Structural Change and the Unit Root Hypothesis
By David H. Papell and Ruxandra Prodan
-
Small Sample Properties of Certain Cointegration Test Statistics: A Monte Carlo Study
-
Saving Growth Nexus in Pakistan: Innovation Accounting Technique
-
Economic Growth and Business Cycles: A Critical Comment on Detrending Time Series
-
Unit Root Testing with Stationary Covariates and a Structural Break in the Trend Function
-
Resurrecting the U.K. Historic Sector National Accounts
By Bill Martin
-
Unit Roots, Level Shifts and Trend Breaks in Per Capita Output: A Robust Evaluation
By Mohitosh Kejriwal and Claude Lopez
