Download This PaperThe Ethics and Empirics of Double Hatting
ESIL Reflection Vol. 6 No. 7
13 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2017
Date Written: July 24, 2017
Abstract
Is it time to end the practice of double hatting in international adjudication? In this ESIL Reflection, we examine the practice of double hatting in the specific context of international investment arbitration. We ask three questions: how widespread is the practice; when is it a problem; and what can be done? In doing so, we introduce and develop new empirical findings but also make links between investment arbitration and broader practices in international adjudication.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Daniel Behn
Queen Mary University of London ( email )
67-69 Lincoln’s Inn Fields
London, WC2A 3JB
United Kingdom
+44 03791 085569 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://bit.ly/qmul-behn
PluriCourts University of Oslo ( email )
PO Box 6706
St Olavs Plass 5
Oslo, 0130
Norway
+44 03791 085569 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://bit.ly/pluricourts-behn