ESIL Reflection Vol. 6 No. 7
12 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2017
Date Written: July 24, 2017
Is it time to end the practice of double hatting in international adjudication? In this ESIL Reflection, we examine the practice of double hatting in the specific context of international investment arbitration. We ask three questions: how widespread is the practice; when is it a problem; and what can be done? In doing so, we introduce and develop new empirical findings but also make links between investment arbitration and broader practices in international adjudication.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Langford, Malcolm and Behn, Daniel and Lie, Runar, The Ethics and Empirics of Double Hatting (July 24, 2017). ESIL Reflection Vol. 6 No. 7. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3008643