Reconsidering Experimental Use

31 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2017

Date Written: June 2017


In the years since the Supreme Court began to narrow the scope of patentable subject matter, uncertainties in the law have had a deleterious impact on several important innovation sectors, including in particular, the life sciences industry. There are now initiatives to expand patentable subject matter legislatively. In this article, I suggest that the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence is an outgrowth of the concern that patents on fundamental discoveries impede scientific research. To deal with that issue, any measure to expand the subject matter of patenting should be coupled with a parallel expansion of defenses to infringement liability, including the restoration of a robust research defense. Most developed countries recognize strong defenses in favor of researchers and as OECD studies show, several are developing creative environments that lure scientists to relocate. It is therefore essential that the United States move quickly to enact laws that both encourage and facilitate research and that will preserve its technological dominance.

Keywords: patent, research exemption, patentable subject matter, genes, diagnostics

Suggested Citation

Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Reconsidering Experimental Use (June 2017). Akron Law Review, Forthcoming, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 17-20, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 17-16, Available at SSRN:

Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss (Contact Author)

New York University - School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6258 (Phone)
212-995-4760 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics