The Political Economy of Fiscal Transparency and Independent Fiscal Councils

45 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2017 Last revised: 31 Mar 2021

See all articles by Roel M. W. J. Beetsma

Roel M. W. J. Beetsma

University of Amsterdam - Research Institute in Economics & Econometrics (RESAM); European Commission; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute); Tinbergen Institute; Netspar

Xavier Debrun

International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department

Randolph Sloof

University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Economics & Business (FEB); Tinbergen Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 2017

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that an increase in fiscal transparency is frequently, but not always, beneficial to society. To this end, we build a model in which voters care about both competence and congruence (e.g. ideology) of policymakers. They obtain imperfect information about the competence of the candidates, the state of the economy and the level of public debt chosen by the incumbent. More transparency makes the signals about these three variables more precise. Public debt is excessive because policymakers are both "partisan", i.e. they spend more now because they may lose office, and "opportunistic", i.e. they spend more now to appear more competent vis-à-vis the electorate. We formally show that more transparency about public debt is irrelevant for the debt choice and thus welfare, while more transparency about the economic state is always less preferred by voters and the incumbent than more transparency about competence is. The latter is always supported by voters and the incumbent when the incumbent does not hold too large an electoral advantage. For the case in which he does have a substantial electoral advantage, no unequivocal formal results are obtained and we resort to numerical analysis. These reveal that the incumbent is then frequently against raising transparency about competence, while the voter may or may not be in favor, but is always more so than the incumbent is. Our analysis arguably yields some implications for independent fiscal councils (IFCs), nowadays a popular instrument for raising fiscal transparency: (i) establishing an IFC can only lower the debt bias if voters care sufficiently about policymakers' competence; (ii) not all political environments are conducive to the emergence of IFCs; and (iii) IFCs are vulnerable to shifts in political conditions.

JEL Classification: E62, H6

Suggested Citation

Beetsma, Roel M. W. J. and Debrun, Xavier and Sloof, Randolph, The Political Economy of Fiscal Transparency and Independent Fiscal Councils (July 2017). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12181, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3011419

Roel M. W. J. Beetsma (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam - Research Institute in Economics & Econometrics (RESAM) ( email )

P.O.Box 15867
Amsterdam
Netherlands
+31 20 525 5280 (Phone)

European Commission ( email )

Rue de la Loi 200
Brussels, B-1049
Belgium

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.CESifo.de

Tinbergen Institute ( email )

Gustav Mahlerplein 117
Amsterdam, 1082 MS
Netherlands

Netspar ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands

Xavier Debrun

International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department ( email )

700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States
202-623-8321 (Phone)
202-623-6343 (Fax)

Randolph Sloof

University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Economics & Business (FEB) ( email )

Roetersstraat 11
Amsterdam, 1018 WB
Netherlands
+31 20 525 5241 (Phone)
+31 20 525 4310 (Fax)

Tinbergen Institute ( email )

Gustav Mahlerplein 117
Amsterdam, 1082 MS
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
0
Abstract Views
219
PlumX Metrics