Consumer Litigation Funding and Medical Malpractice Litigation: Examining the Effect of Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corporation

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2017, Forthcoming

45 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2017

See all articles by Jean Xiao

Jean Xiao

Vanderbilt University - Law and Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 30, 2017

Abstract

Consumer litigation funding, a growing industry in the United States, is an alternative credit source for cash-strapped tort plaintiffs. Financiers give plaintiffs nonrecourse loans that are premised on lawsuit outcomes. This paper is the first to empirically examine the effect of consumer litigation funding. Specifically, I explore the impact of nonrecourse loans on medical malpractice litigation outcomes by exploiting the variation in timing and geography from two Ohio policy changes: the Ohio Supreme Court’s 2003 ban of funding in Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corporation and the state’s subsequent legislative legalization of funding in 2008. Using closed claim data from the National Practitioner Data Bank, I find evidence that the availability of funding increases claim payment and claim duration.

Keywords: Consumer Litigation Funding, Consumer Legal Finance, Litigation Funding, Legal Finance, Alternative Litigation Funding

JEL Classification: I18, G23, G28

Suggested Citation

Xiao, Jean, Consumer Litigation Funding and Medical Malpractice Litigation: Examining the Effect of Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corporation (June 30, 2017). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2017, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3012180

Jean Xiao (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law and Economics ( email )

Nashville, TN
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.vanderbilt.edu/phd/students/jeanxiao.php

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
308
PlumX Metrics