Pitfalls Along the Brave New Energy Federalism Path

Texas Law Review See Also (2017)

10 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2017

See all articles by Amy L. Stein

Amy L. Stein

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Date Written: August 3, 2017


In his Texas Law Review article, The Brave New Path of Energy Federalism, Professor Jim Rossi takes an insightful and comprehensive study of the federalism implications of three recent Supreme Court decisions. After decades of judicial precedent interpreting the Federal Power Act and the Natural Gas Act as dividing energy authority between federal and state actors along bright lines, these opinions have breathed new life into a more case-by-case approach to energy federalism disputes. Professor Rossi has argued persuasively that recent Supreme Court jurisprudence has limited dual sovereignty’s role as the organizing federalism principle under energy statutes. Alternatively, Professor Rossi’s novel approach argues for concurrent jurisdiction over energy. Instead of a default to preemption principles that further entrench the idea of separate spheres, Professor Rossi urges a pragmatic focus on the purposes behind each regulator’s actions. While a move away from harsh preemption is tempting, this response illustrates a few obstacles associated with its implementation.

Keywords: federalism, energy, clean energy, Federal Power Act

Suggested Citation

Stein, Amy L., Pitfalls Along the Brave New Energy Federalism Path (August 3, 2017). Texas Law Review See Also (2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3012974

Amy L. Stein (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0953 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics