Social Insecurity: The Case for Totalization with India

Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2016

9 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2017

See all articles by Joshua J. Craddock

Joshua J. Craddock

Harvard University, Law School, Students ; James Wilson Institute for Natural Rights and the American Founding

Date Written: August 26, 2016

Abstract

Under current U.S.-India policy, expatriate workers pay into both countries’ social security systems, but are ineligible for benefits from the system in their nation of employment. This dual taxation leads to economic inefficiency and harms both Indian and American citizens working overseas. This short commentary argues that concluding a social security totalization agreement between the United States and India would benefit both countries' businesses, workers, and economies.

Keywords: social security, totalization, totalisation, dual taxation, dual taxation avoidance agreement, double taxation, taxation, India, foreign policy, legislation, international relations, immigration, temporary workers

Suggested Citation

Craddock, Joshua J., Social Insecurity: The Case for Totalization with India (August 26, 2016). Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3014195

Joshua J. Craddock (Contact Author)

Harvard University, Law School, Students ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

James Wilson Institute for Natural Rights and the American Founding

722 13th St. NW
Fourth Floor
Washington, DC District of Columbia 20005
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://jameswilsoninstitute.org/

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
233
PlumX Metrics