Why R.R. V. M.H. Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook

12 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2017  

David Epstein

University of Richmond - School of Law

Date Written: August 9, 2017

Abstract

This essay is a response to Professor Charles Calleros’ recently posted paper “Why Pyeatte v. Pyeate Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook” and Professor’s Calleros’ invitation for other faculty to share their favorite cases.

Keywords: contracts

Suggested Citation

Epstein, David, Why R.R. V. M.H. Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook (August 9, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3015923 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015923

David Epstein (Contact Author)

University of Richmond - School of Law ( email )

28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
rank
325,842
Abstract Views
200
PlumX