The Momentum of Domestic Criminal Proceedings Supervision Through Investment Treaty Arbitration

24 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2017

Date Written: August 9, 2017

Abstract

Investor-State arbitration represents an intriguing topic whose relationship with EU law remains partially unsettled. It is becoming increasingly relevant for criminal law practitioners as the jurisprudence of arbitral tribunals shows to consider interim measures interfering with or impacting upon criminal investigations in the so called “host State”. In the past, Investor-State arbitration has been accused of upholding economic interests of multi-national companies (MNC) against at the detriment of developing States and other values and purported as a vehicle of domination imposing “neo-liberal rule of law”. The intrusions into spaces pertaining to the exercise of criminal jurisdiction by host States has further suggested a possible misuse to escape prosecution. Although the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction by arbitral tribunals jurisdiction may mostly be praised, its legal base is still questionable and some recent "intra-EU" digressions in the field of criminal law raise even more doubts.

Keywords: Bilateral Investment Treaties, investor State arbitration, ICSID, diplomatic protection, res iudicata, privies, supervisory jurisdiction, interim measures, stay of criminal proceedings, integrity of the proceeding, Exclusiveness of remedies, European Union Law, Human rights, extradition

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K29, K13, K33

Suggested Citation

Pierini, Jean Paul, The Momentum of Domestic Criminal Proceedings Supervision Through Investment Treaty Arbitration (August 9, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3015947 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015947

Jean Paul Pierini (Contact Author)

Italian Navy ( email )

Roma, Genova 10100
Italy

Independent ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
118
Abstract Views
711
rank
320,540
PlumX Metrics