Two Fallacies About DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement

28 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2002

See all articles by David H. Kaye

David H. Kaye

PSU - Penn State Law (University Park); ASU - College of Law & School of Life Sciences


This commentary on the article Legal and Policy Issues in Expanding the Scope of Law Enforcement DNA Data Banks, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 127 (2001), by Mark Rothstein and Sandra Carnahan, argues that the case for confining law enforcement DNA databases to noncoding loci and to samples from individuals convicted of violent crimes is quite weak.

It describes alternative approaches, including the possibility of a population-wide database; the privacy implications of the loci now used in forensic identification; the law governing DNA dragnets; and the limits on DNA databases imposed by recent cases on searches and seizures. It notes the importance of addressing issues of racial equality along with privacy concerns in designing DNA databases for law enforcement.

Keywords: bioethics, privacy, databases, criminal procedure, search and seizure

JEL Classification: K14, K32

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., Two Fallacies About DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement. Available at SSRN: or

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)

PSU - Penn State Law (University Park)

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States


ASU - College of Law & School of Life Sciences ( email )

111 E Taylor St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
United States


Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics