What Makes a Political Theory Political? A Comment on Waldron

14 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2017

See all articles by Samuel Bagg

Samuel Bagg

Research Group on Constitutional Studies, McGill

Date Written: August 8, 2017

Abstract

This essay considers Jeremy Waldron’s recent contribution to a growing conversation about how to make political theory and philosophy more responsive to real politics—Political Political Theory (2016)—in light of his broader body of work, especially Law and Disagreement (1999). I argue that rather than providing a genuine alternative to the idealization and abstraction characteristic of what Waldron labels the “justice industry,” he uses the concept of what counts as properly “political” to grant nearly absolute priority to a certain class of concerns over others. This strategy places him in the company of a long line of liberal theorists, but it does not necessarily make his theory more political than its rivals. His alternative simply focuses its idealization and abstraction on the ideal of legitimacy rather than justice.

Keywords: realism, legitimacy, justice, Jeremy Waldron

Suggested Citation

Bagg, Samuel, What Makes a Political Theory Political? A Comment on Waldron (August 8, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3018513 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018513

Samuel Bagg (Contact Author)

Research Group on Constitutional Studies, McGill ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
334
rank
350,972
PlumX Metrics