The Separation of Powers and Constitutional Scholarship

H.M.T.D. ten Napel & W.J.M. Voermans (eds.), The Powers That Be: Rethinking the Separation of Powers (Leiden: Leiden University Press 2016), p. 35-46.

Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 14

Posted: 18 Aug 2017 Last revised: 8 Jun 2021

Date Written: August 15, 2017

Abstract

This chapter discusses methodological approaches to the separation of powers. It argues that constitutional scholarship needs to move beyond strictly positive and strictly normative approaches. The chapter proceeds on two levels. On the first level, it reviews "The Three Branches" by Christoph Möllers (Oxford University Press 2013). On the second level, it sketches the contours of an approach to the separation of powers, and to constitutions more generally, that takes into account their social and political context.

Keywords: Separation of powers, constitutional scholarship, Christoph Möllers

Suggested Citation

Stremler, Maarten, The Separation of Powers and Constitutional Scholarship (August 15, 2017). H.M.T.D. ten Napel & W.J.M. Voermans (eds.), The Powers That Be: Rethinking the Separation of Powers (Leiden: Leiden University Press 2016), p. 35-46., Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 14, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019522

Maarten Stremler (Contact Author)

Maastricht University ( email )

Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
293
PlumX Metrics