34 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2017
Date Written: August 16, 2017
When you hear the word “terrorist,” who do you picture? Chances are, it was not a white person. In the United States, two common though false narratives about terrorists who attack America abound. We see them on television, in the movies, on the news, and, currently, in the Trump Administration. The first is that “terrorists are always (brown) Muslims.” The second is that “white people are never terrorists.”
Different strands of critical race theory can help us understand these two narratives. One strand examines the role of unconscious cognitive biases in the production of stereotypes, such as the stereotype of the “Muslim terrorist.” Another strand focuses on white privilege, such as the privilege of avoiding the terrorist label.
These false narratives play a crucial role in Trump’s propaganda. As the critical race analysis uncovers, these two narratives dovetail with two constituent parts of propaganda: flawed ideologies and aspirational myths. Propaganda relies on pre-existing false ideologies, which is another way to describe racist stereotyping. Propaganda also relies on certain ideals and myths, in this case, the myth of white innocence and white superiority. Thus, the Trump Administration’s intentional invocation of both narratives amounts to propaganda in more than just the colloquial sense.
Part I illustrates each of the two narratives. Part II analyzes them through a critical race lens, showing how they map onto two strands of critical race theory. Part III examines how these narratives simultaneously enable and comprise propaganda. Finally, Part IV argues that the propagation of these false narratives hurts the nation’s security.
Keywords: propaganda, terrorism, Islam, Arab, muslim ban, stereotype, cognitive bias, white supremacy, racism, critical race theory, privilege, ideology, myth, national security, Trump
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Corbin, Caroline Mala, 'Terrorists are Always Muslim But Never White': At the Intersection of Critical Race Theory and Propaganda (August 16, 2017). Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming; University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3020330