Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

A Critique of the Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984

44 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2002  

Stephen M. Bainbridge

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Abstract

Congress intended that the Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984 should increase the deterrent effect of the insider trading prohibition without changing the substantive common law governing insider trading cases. Towards that end, the Act created a civil penalty of up to three times the profit gained, or loss avoided, through trading while in possession of material nonpublic information. This article examines the Act and considers its probable effect on insider trading. the article begins with an historical overview of the development of the insider trading prohibition. The article then discusses the adoption of the Act and examines its provisions in the context of then-existing law. Finally, the article criticizes the Act, suggesting that it will not have the deterrent effect anticipated by its drafters, and examines the possible effects of the ITSA on the further development of the federal insider trading prohibition.

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Bainbridge, Stephen M., A Critique of the Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984. Virigina Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 455, 1985. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=302049 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302049

Stephen Mark Bainbridge (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1599 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.professorbainbridge.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
755
Rank
26,274
Abstract Views
5,615