58 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2017
Date Written: August 18, 2017
There is a big controversy about the consequences of High-Frequency Traders (HFTs) activity on market quality. This empirical study uses a unique data set provided by the French regulator "Autorité des Marchés Financiers" and gives some evidence concerning the practices of these members under market stress. On the one hand, we investigate the changes in HFTs behaviour related to the level of market stress at a daily scale. On the other hand, we analyse the intraday reactions of these specific market participants to various announcements. We find that in the absence of significant news, whatever the market conditions, HFTs are the main contributors to liquidity with a participation of 80% in the market depth at the three best limits. They constitute 60% of the traded amounts, with an aggressive/passive ratio equal to 53%. We identify a change of regime in the presence of scheduled news that goes beyond the expected reaction to volatility variations. This is notably characterised by an additional decrease by 15% of HFTs share in market depth. Moreover, we focus on two specific events: the European Central Bank announcements of the 3rd of December 2015 that occurred within a trading day and the Brexit that occurred prior to the market opening. Based on these two particular cases, we get that in extreme situations, when non-HFTs have time to adjust their trading tactics, they act as liquidity providers in place of HFTs.
Keywords: High frequency trading, volatility, microstructure, regulation
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Megarbane, Nicolas and Saliba, Pamela and Lehalle, Charles‐Albert and Rosenbaum, Mathieu, The Behaviour of High-Frequency Traders Under Different Market Stress Scenarios (August 18, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3021829