The MacPherson-Henningsen Puzzle

9 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2017

Date Written: August 08, 2017

Abstract

In the landmark case of MacPherson v. Buick, an automobile company was held liable for negligence notwithstanding a lack of privity with the injured driver. Four decades later, in Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, the court held unconscionable the standard automobile company warranty which limited its responsibility to repair and replacement, even in a case involving physical injury. This suggests a puzzle: if it were so easy for firms to contract out of liability, did MacPherson accomplish anything?

Keywords: Contracts, Torts, Remedies

Suggested Citation

Goldberg, Victor Paul, The MacPherson-Henningsen Puzzle (August 08, 2017). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 570, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022224 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3022224

Victor Paul Goldberg (Contact Author)

Columbia Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
212-854-8380 (Phone)
212-854-0221 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
844
rank
284,796
PlumX Metrics