The MacPherson-Henningsen Puzzle
9 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2017
Date Written: August 08, 2017
Abstract
In the landmark case of MacPherson v. Buick, an automobile company was held liable for negligence notwithstanding a lack of privity with the injured driver. Four decades later, in Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, the court held unconscionable the standard automobile company warranty which limited its responsibility to repair and replacement, even in a case involving physical injury. This suggests a puzzle: if it were so easy for firms to contract out of liability, did MacPherson accomplish anything?
Keywords: Contracts, Torts, Remedies
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Goldberg, Victor Paul, The MacPherson-Henningsen Puzzle (August 08, 2017). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 570, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022224 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3022224
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.