Risk Assessment in Sentencing

Academy for Justice, a Report on Scholarship and Criminal Justice Reform (Erik Luna ed., 2017, Forthcoming).

Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2017-44

14 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2017

See all articles by John Monahan

John Monahan

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: August 22, 2017

Abstract

One way to reduce mass incarceration and the fiscal and human sufferings intrinsic to it is to engage in a morally constrained form of risk assessment in sentencing offenders. The assessment of an offender’s risk of recidivism was once a central component of criminal sentencing in the United States. In the mid-1970s, however, sentencing based on forward-looking assessments of offender risk was abolished in many jurisdictions in favor of set periods of confinement based solely on backward-looking appraisals of offender blameworthiness. This situation is rapidly changing, however. After a hiatus of 40 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in risk assessment in criminal sentencing. Across the political spectrum, advocates have proposed that mass incarceration can be shrunk without simultaneously jeopardizing the historically low crime rate if we put a morally constrained form of risk assessment back into sentencing.

Keywords: risk assessment, dangerousness, sentencing, prediction, desert

Suggested Citation

Monahan, John, Risk Assessment in Sentencing (August 22, 2017). Academy for Justice, a Report on Scholarship and Criminal Justice Reform (Erik Luna ed., 2017, Forthcoming).; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2017-44. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3024016

John Monahan (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-3632 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
238
Abstract Views
930
rank
134,615
PlumX Metrics