The Phenomenology of Medico-Legal Causation

Dalhousie Law Journal (forthcoming)

37 Pages Posted: 26 Aug 2017

See all articles by Nicholas Hooper

Nicholas Hooper

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law, Students

Date Written: August 24, 2017

Abstract

The language of counterfactual causation employed from the bench obscures the analytical vacuity of the “but for” test. This paper takes issue with the consistent recourse to “common sense” as a methodological tool for determining the deeply complex issue of causality. Despite manifestly empty gestures to, e.g., robust pragmatism, the current approach imposes the dominant values of the judiciary in a manner that perpetuates the current distribution of power. Whatever the merits of counterfactual inquiry, its legal iteration requires judges to construct a hypothetical narrative about “how things generally happen.” This, in turn, impels a uniquely comprehensive brand of judicial creativity. The results are productively examined in the context of medical malpractice, where the phenomenological lens foregrounds the connection between meaningless doctrine and the protection of the medical elite.

Keywords: Negligence, Tort Law, Causation, Phenomenology

Suggested Citation

Hooper, Nicholas, The Phenomenology of Medico-Legal Causation (August 24, 2017). Dalhousie Law Journal (forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3025470

Nicholas Hooper (Contact Author)

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law, Students ( email )

Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
537
rank
424,961
PlumX Metrics