The Case against a National Court of Appeal

91 Australian Law Journal 670 (2017)

13 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2017

See all articles by Shawn Rajanayagam

Shawn Rajanayagam

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School

Date Written: 2017

Abstract

There have been recurrent proposals for the creation of a national court of appeal. These proposals have not, thus far, been acted upon. The idea of a national court of appeal recently resurfaced in a speech given by the Chief Justice of Victoria, Marilyn Warren. In this article, I contend that a national court of appeal should not be established. That is so because the creation of a national court of appeal would upset the present appellate hierarchy, which, unlike the system that would exist if a national court of appeal were established, reflects a subtle balance between the requirements of consistency and comity, and the principle of federalism. Further, the extant system affords proper respect for the High Court’s role as Australia’s ultimate appellate court and its consequent position as conclusive arbiter of the single common law of Australia.

Suggested Citation

Rajanayagam, Shawn, The Case against a National Court of Appeal (2017). 91 Australian Law Journal 670 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3025841

Shawn Rajanayagam (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School ( email )

185 Pelham Street
Melbourne, VIC 3010
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
160
PlumX Metrics