Explaining Inhumanity: The Use of Crime-Definition Experts at International Criminal Courts

48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 359

67 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2017

See all articles by Caroline Davidson

Caroline Davidson

Willamette University - College of Law

Date Written: August 25, 2014

Abstract

International criminal courts must not only decide the guilt or innocence of defendants in immensely serious cases, but also make good law in the process. To help them do so, these courts have turned to experts. This Article identifies a type of expert witness that, thus far, has escaped scholarly attention: the crime-definition expert. Crime-definition experts have provided expert reports and testimony to international criminal courts on the meaning of the very crimes with which defendants are charged, including genocide, forced marriage, and recruitment and use of child soldiers. This Article critically evaluates the risks associated with using crime-definition experts in international criminal trials. Ultimately, it concludes that crime-definition experts may help tribunals achieve the various aims of international criminal justice, but have the potential to impair defendants’ rights and impede the tribunals’ ability to advance expressive and restorative justice aims. It advocates judicious use, if any, of these experts and proposes measures to reap the most benefit from crime-definition experts while minimizing the risks inherent in their use.

Suggested Citation

Davidson, Caroline, Explaining Inhumanity: The Use of Crime-Definition Experts at International Criminal Courts (August 25, 2014). 48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 359. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3026121

Caroline Davidson (Contact Author)

Willamette University - College of Law ( email )

245 Winter St. SE
Salem, OR 97301
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
97
PlumX Metrics