Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An Empirical Analysis

68 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2002

See all articles by Young Ho Eom

Young Ho Eom

Yonsei University

Jing-Zhi Huang

Pennsylvania State University - University Park - Department of Finance

Jean Helwege

UC Riverside

Date Written: February 2002

Abstract

This paper empirically tests five structural models of corporate bond pricing: Those of Merton (1974), Geske (1977), Leland and Toft (1996), Longstaff and Schwartz (1995), and Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein (2001). We implement the models using a sample of 182 bond prices from firms with simple capital structures during the period 1986-1997. The conventional wisdom is that structural models do not generate spreads as high as those seen in the bond market, and true to expectations we find that the predicted spreads in our implementation of the Merton model are too low. The compound option approach of Geske comes much closer to the spreads observed in the market, on average, but still underpredicts spreads. In contrast, the Leland and Toft model substantially overestimates credit risk on most bonds, and especially so for high coupon bonds. The Longstaff and Schwartz model modifies Merton to incorporate a stochastic interest rate and a correlation between interest rates and firm value. While the correlation and the level of interest rates have little effect, higher interest rate volatility leads to higher predicted spreads. However, this and other features of this model result in spreads that are often too high for risky bonds and too low for safe bonds. The target leverage ratio model of Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein helps to raise the spreads on the bonds that were considered very safe by the Longstaff and Schwartz model, but overall tends toward overestimation of credit risk. We conclude that structural models do not systematically underpredict spreads, as the previous literature implies, but accuracy is a problem. Moreover, some of the simplifications made to date lead to overestimation of credit risk on the riskier bonds while scarcely affecting the spreads of the safest bonds.

Keywords: Credit risk, structural models

JEL Classification: G12, G13

Suggested Citation

Eom, Young Ho and Huang, Jing-Zhi Jay and Helwege, Jean, Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An Empirical Analysis (February 2002). EFA 2002 Berlin Meetings. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=302681 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302681

Young Ho Eom

Yonsei University ( email )

College of Business and Economics
Seoul 120-749
South Korea
+82 2 361 4193 (Phone)
+82 2 392 0504 (Fax)

Jing-Zhi Jay Huang

Pennsylvania State University - University Park - Department of Finance ( email )

University Park, PA 16802
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.personal.psu.edu/jxh56

Jean Helwege (Contact Author)

UC Riverside ( email )

900 University Ave.
Anderson Hall
Riverside, CA 92521
United States
9518274284 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
3,096
rank
3,162
Abstract Views
13,153
PlumX