Abuse of Power – An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Power and Transparency on Centralized Punishment

85 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2017 Last revised: 30 Nov 2023

See all articles by Leonard Hoeft

Leonard Hoeft

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Wladislaw Mill

University of Mannheim - Department of Economics

Date Written: November 23, 2023

Abstract

We investigate power abuse of a single punisher in a public-goods-game subject to variations in punishment power and contribution transparency. We find a high amount of abuse across all conditions. More power led to more abuse over time, while transparency could only curb abuse in the high power conditions. These findings highlight the dangers of power centralization, but suggest a more complex relation of power and transparency.

Keywords: Punishment, Public-Goods-Game, Designated Punishment, Abuse, Transparency, Power

JEL Classification: H41, C92, K42

Suggested Citation

Hoeft, Leonard and Mill, Wladislaw, Abuse of Power – An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Power and Transparency on Centralized Punishment (November 23, 2023). MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 2017/15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3027981 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3027981

Leonard Hoeft (Contact Author)

Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ( email )

Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 10
D-53113 Bonn, 53113
Germany

Wladislaw Mill

University of Mannheim - Department of Economics ( email )

D-68131 Mannheim
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
364
Abstract Views
1,408
Rank
151,600
PlumX Metrics