Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Return of the Unprovided-For Case

Georgia Law Review, Vol. 51, 2017

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-360

45 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2017 Last revised: 6 Sep 2017

Michael S Green

William & Mary Law School

Date Written: September 6, 2017

Abstract

The unprovided-for case is a puzzle that arises under governmental interest analysis, the predominant choice-of-law approach in the United States. As its name suggests, in the unprovided-for case the law of no jurisdiction seems to apply. There is a gap in the law. After its discovery by Brainerd Currie in the 1950s, the unprovided-for case proved to be an embarrassment for interest analysts and a focal point for critics. In 1989, however, Larry Kramer published an argument that the unprovided-for case is a myth. There is no gap in the law. Kramer’s argument has been well-received, so much so that discussion of the unprovided-for case has receded among advocates and critics of interest analysis alike.

But the myth is a myth. What Kramer actually shows is not that preexisting law always applies in the unprovided-for case, but that regulatory policies can always be found to recommend law to fill the gap that the unprovided-for case creates. These policies are reasons for laws. They are not themselves laws. Law is not found in the unprovided-for case — it is made.

One might think that looking to freestanding regulatory policies to create law in the unprovided-for case is not a serious problem, since that is what courts normally do when there is a gap in the law. One would be wrong. If a court must look to freestanding regulatory policies to create law in the unprovided-for case, it must do the same in all choice-of-law cases, for these policies are relevant to them too. Interest analysis collapses as a result, leaving no clear choice-of-law method in its place.

Keywords: Conflict of Laws, Choice of Law, Interest Analysis, Unprovided-For Case, Brainerd Currie, Larry Kramer

Suggested Citation

Green, Michael S, The Return of the Unprovided-For Case (September 6, 2017). Georgia Law Review, Vol. 51, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3028228

Michael Green (Contact Author)

William & Mary Law School ( email )

South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
(757) 221-7746 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Rank
277,642
Abstract Views
166