A Theory of Facts and Circumstances

52 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2017 Last revised: 31 Oct 2017

See all articles by Andrew T. Hayashi

Andrew T. Hayashi

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: July 18, 2017


The legal consequences of an action often depend on information that only the actor knows. This information is typically inferred from the observable “facts and circumstances” attending the actor’s conduct, which creates a seemingly unresolvable tension in legal design. On the one hand, these unstructured inquiries give free rein to the factfinder’s judgment about which facts justify an inference to the hidden information. On the other hand, specifying the facts that will be used to draw that inference would provide a roadmap for actors to strategically adjust their conduct to manipulate the factfinder’s conclusions. I argue that this tension can be resolved by applying insights from the economics literature on asymmetric information. These insights help answer both the substantive question of which facts and circumstances should be taken into account and the procedural question of whether they should be specified by the legislature or left to the courts.

Suggested Citation

Hayashi, Andrew T., A Theory of Facts and Circumstances (July 18, 2017). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2017, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2017-52, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2017-22, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3032986

Andrew T. Hayashi (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics