A Law of Rules: A Critique and Reconstruction of Justice Scalia's View of the Rule of Law
27 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 2002
In one of the most influential articles in contemporary practical jurisprudence, Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court advances the thesis that the rule of law requires a law of rules. Scalia argues that rule-of-law values favor general rules over all-of-the-circumstances balancing tests as a tool for the elaboration of legal norms in a common-law system. There are two conceptual problems with the thesis that the rule of law requires a law of rules. The first is the problem of social practice. This problem is based on the idea that the same legal forms can take on quite different meanings when embedded in different social contexts. The second problem is the problem of character. This problem is based on the idea that legal actors, e.g., judges or lawyers, have forms of discretion that cannot be directly controlled by legal forms. The rule of law does not require a law of rules; nor does a law of rules guarantee the rule of law. Rather, the rule of law requires sound practical judgment by judges of integrity.
JEL Classification: K40, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
The Law Reform Olympics: Measuring the Effects of Law Reform in Transition Economies
Bringing Justice to the Poor: Bottom-Up Legal Development Cooperation
Polygamy and Mixed Marriage in Indonesia: Islam and the Marriage Law in the Courts
By Simon Butt
Varieties of Rule of Law: An Introduction and Provisional Conclusion
The World Bank, the IMF, and Human Rights
Socializing Law, Privatizing Law, Monopolizing Law, Accessing Law
Asia's Legal Systems in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Can the Rule of Law Carry Any of the Weight?
On Rule of Law Rhetoric, Economic Development, and Northeast Asia