Supplementary Leverage Ratio and Repo Supply
42 Pages Posted: 25 Feb 2018
There are 2 versions of this paper
Do Higher Capital Standards Always Reduce Bank Risk? The Impact of the Basel Leverage Ratio on the U.S. Triparty Repo Market
Date Written: November 1, 2016
Abstract
While simpler than risk-based capital requirements, the leverage ratio may encourage bank risk-taking. This paper examines the activity of broker-dealers affiliated with bank holding companies (BHCs) and broker-dealers not affiliated with BHCs in the repurchase agreement (repo) market to test whether this may be occurring. Using data on the triparty repo market, the paper arrives at three findings. First, following the 2012 introduction of the supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), broker-dealer affiliates of BHCs decreased their repo borrowing but increased their use of repo backed by more price-volatile collateral. Second, the paper finds that regardless of whether a U.S. BHC-affiliated broker-dealer parent is above or below the SLR requirement, the announcement of the SLR rule has disincentivized those dealers affiliated with BHCs from borrowing in triparty repo. Finally, the paper finds an increase in the number of active nonbank-affiliated dealers in certain asset classes of triparty repo since the 2012 introduction of the supplementary leverage ratio. This illustrates how regulation can have competitive effects on the financial sector and may result in activities shifting among financial firms.
Keywords: Banking, leverage ratio, heightened prudential regulation, repurchase agreement, global systemically important banks, regulatory impact assessment
JEL Classification: G28, G21, G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
