From Russia With Love

36 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2017 Last revised: 19 Mar 2021

See all articles by David Thaw

David Thaw

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law; University of Pittsburgh - School of Information Sciences; Yale University - Information Society Project; University of Pittsburgh - Graduate School of Public & International Affairs

Date Written: March 15, 2021

Abstract

This Article examines the questions of Election Interference in a digital interconnected age. It identifies a typology which distinguishes between: (1) “Election Hacking,” which targets infrastructure and records; and (2) “Influence Operations,” which comprise persuasive messaging targeting how or whether individuals choose to vote. It distinguishes between the types of technological and legal solutions available to each category, and between the types of ex ante and ex post legal solutions and redress which are available in each category.

Using this typology of problems and potential solutions, this Article concludes that the persuasive messaging regarding policy matters poses the greatest challenge in unlawful foreign Election Interference. These Influence Operations are not amenable to technological methods of prevention and face significant challenges for legal solutions. Ex ante legal solutions face steep First Amendment hurdles and ex post legal redress either is unavailable or non-justiciable.

Despite these challenges, this Article argues that three categories of actors, working within their respective capacities and limitations, can significantly mitigate the impacts of unlawful foreign Influence Operations. Government actors can conduct investigative and counterintelligence operations to identify unlawful foreign activities, shut them down, and potentially stop dissemination before it enters the protected political sphere. Such activities also can inform the choices of social media platform operators to enforce rules, flag content, and provide links to official or trusted third-party information sources on their “private property.” And engaged, respectful, and persuasive discourse among individual citizens can directly mitigate the impact of Influence Operations. Indeed, this information “market” has functioned for centuries in traditional media, and there is no reason to believe that it cannot continue to do so, buttressed by carefully-construed government assistance.

Keywords: cybersecurity, elections, hacking, risk management

Suggested Citation

Thaw, David, From Russia With Love (March 15, 2021). U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-32, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3038308. or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3038308

David Thaw (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.davidthaw.com

University of Pittsburgh - School of Information Sciences ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Yale University - Information Society Project ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

University of Pittsburgh - Graduate School of Public & International Affairs ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15260-0001
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
1,414
rank
223,940
PlumX Metrics