Reconsidering Returns

66 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2017 Last revised: 11 May 2020

See all articles by Samuel M. Hartzmark

Samuel M. Hartzmark

Boston College - Carroll School of Management

David H. Solomon

Boston College - Carroll School of Management

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 12, 2019

Abstract

Investors' perception of performance is biased because the relevant measure, returns, is rarely displayed. Major indices ignore dividends, inducing mechanical underperformance on ex-dividend days. Newspapers are more pessimistic on these days, consistent with mistaking the index for a return. Market betas should track returns, but track prices more than dividends, creating predictable market returns. Mutual funds receive inflows for “beating the S&P 500,” comparing the price-only index with the fund's net asset value change (also not a return). Displaying returns by default would ameliorate these issues, which arise despite high attention and little ambiguity regarding the appropriate measure.

Keywords: Returns, Behavioral Finance, Asset Pricing, Indices, Mutual Funds, Information Display

JEL Classification: G02, G11, G12, G14, N32

Suggested Citation

Hartzmark, Samuel M. and Solomon, David H., Reconsidering Returns (March 12, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3039507 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039507

Samuel M. Hartzmark (Contact Author)

Boston College - Carroll School of Management ( email )

140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States

David H. Solomon

Boston College - Carroll School of Management ( email )

140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,837
Abstract Views
8,857
Rank
16,292
PlumX Metrics