The Opinion of AG Wahl in the Intel Rebates Case: A Triumph of Substance over Form?

30 Pages Posted: 26 Sep 2017

Date Written: April 1, 2017

Abstract

Rebates are a ubiquitous form of price competition which can be utilized either to intensify or to harm competition. Distinguishing pro-competitive from anti-competitive rebates and translating this into effective and administrable legal rules, remains a key challenge for competition law. The recent Opinion by Advocate General Wahl in the Intel appeal has identified deficiencies in the legal approach to dominant firm rebates under Article 102 TFEU and has proposed a ‘more economic’ case-by-case approach to their assessment. The proposed approach and the attempt by AG Wahl to reconcile it with existing case-law, raises a number of important questions for consideration by the European Court of Justice. This article examines AG Wahl’s Opinion and suggests that, while the substance of the proposed approach has merit, the form proposed is deficient in a number of respects.

Keywords: Intel, Rebates, Competition Law, Antitrust

JEL Classification: K21

Suggested Citation

Clarke, Julie N, The Opinion of AG Wahl in the Intel Rebates Case: A Triumph of Substance over Form? (April 1, 2017). World Competition: Law and Economics Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3040366

Julie N Clarke (Contact Author)

Melbourne Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://law.unimelb.edu.au/about/staff/julie-clarke

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
249
Abstract Views
744
rank
123,814
PlumX Metrics