Timing 'Smart Beta' Strategies? Of Course! Buy Low, Sell High!

33 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2017

See all articles by Robert D. Arnott

Robert D. Arnott

Research Affiliates, LLC

Noah Beck

Research Affiliates, LLC

Vitali Kalesnik

Research Affiliates Global Advisors

Date Written: September 2016


In our paper — “How Can ‘Smart Beta’ Go Horribly Wrong?” — we show that performance chasing can be as dangerous in smart beta as it is in stock selection, fund selection, or asset allocation. We differentiate between “revaluation alpha” and “structural alpha.” The former is the part of the past return that came from rising valuations. Revaluation alpha is nonrecurring, and is at least as likely to reverse as to persist. Rising valuations create an illusion of alpha and encourage performance chasing.

Structural alpha is the part of the past return that was delivered net of any impact from rising valuations. Why do we emphasize rising valuations? Because factors and strategies with tumbling valuations are rarely noticed in the data mining so pervasive throughout the finance community. For some factors, such as low beta, we show that most or all past performance was revaluation alpha, which could easily reverse from current valuation levels. For smart beta strategies, the picture is a bit better: most established products have respectable structural alpha.

In our paper “To Win with ‘Smart Beta’ Ask If the Price Is Right,” we show that valuations are predictive of future returns. We demonstrate that this result is robust across time, in international and emerging markets, and holds for various metrics used to measure valuations. We also point out that — for the moment, at least — many so-called smart beta strategies are trading in the top quartile, and even top decile, of historical valuations. We caution those who believe past is prologue and are tempted to extrapolate past “alpha” into expected future returns without regard to current valuation levels.

In this paper we explore whether active timing of smart beta strategies and/or factor tilts can benefit investors. We find that performance can easily be improved by emphasizing the factors or strategies that are trading cheap relative to their historical norms and by deemphasizing the more expensive factors or strategies. We also observe that aggressive bets (favoring only the cheapest factor or smart beta strategy) can severely erode Sharpe ratios, so that gentle or moderate tilts toward that factor or strategy would seem to be a sensible compromise. Finally, we note that both factor and smart beta strategies have typically been identified and accepted as potentially alpha generating by the finance and investing communities after a period of impressive success — indeed, many of our own tests include a span that predates their discovery. We show that out-of-sample tests, after a strategy or factor has been discovered, are often far less impressive.

Keywords: smart beta, active timing, factor tilts

JEL Classification: G10

Suggested Citation

Arnott, Robert D. and Beck, Noah and Kalesnik, Vitali, Timing 'Smart Beta' Strategies? Of Course! Buy Low, Sell High! (September 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3040956 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3040956

Robert D. Arnott

Research Affiliates, LLC ( email )

620 Newport Center Dr
Ste 900
Newport Beach, CA 92660
United States
949-325-8700 (Phone)
949-325-8901 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.researchaffiliates.com

Noah Beck

Research Affiliates, LLC ( email )

620 Newport Center Dr
Suite 900
Newport Beach, CA 92660
United States

Vitali Kalesnik (Contact Author)

Research Affiliates Global Advisors ( email )

16 Berkeley Street
London, W1J 8DZ
United Kingdom
+44 2039299880 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.researchaffiliates.com/en_us/home.html

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics