Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

38 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2017

See all articles by Kyle Velte

Kyle Velte

University of Kansas - School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 22, 2017

Abstract

This term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the most significant LGBT-rights case since it recognized marriage equality: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. While the case is framed as a First Amendment case—whether antidiscrimination law, as applied to secular, for-profit business with Christian owners who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds, violates the owners’ Free Exercise and Free Speech rights—there is a secondary and subordinate argument lurking just below the surface, one that presents a risk of great harm to LGBT Americans if it is not exposed and rejected by the Court.

This essay exposes that argument as one that is nothing more than a modernized version of the “status-conduct” argument—an argument used three decades ago to justify the Court’s decision in Bowers v. Hardwick and to deny LGBT Americans the protection of the law in all realms of life. The Religious Right has modernized the status-conduct argument in the seemingly neutral garb of the exalted American values of free speech and religious freedom: Christian business owners are not discriminating based on the status of the gay or lesbian customers when refusing same-sex wedding goods and services, but rather are refusing to participate in conduct—the act of marriage.

We should not be fooled: In using this old trope in new garb, the Religious Right is attempting to achieve what Professor Reva Siegel calls “transformation-through-preservation”—a dynamic through which a group that opposes civil rights reform modernizes its rhetoric after a civil rights victory in an effort to maintain unequal status regimes. The Religious Right’s modernized status-conduct argument attempts to hide its real goal—ushering in an era of Gay Jim Crow.

The essay urges the Court to expose and reject the Religious Right’s attempt at preservation-through-transformation. Failure to do so will preserve anti-equality status regimes by denying formal equality to LGBT Americans and will undermine the legitimacy of the Court’s prior LGBT-rights cases and thus the legitimacy of the Court itself.

Keywords: sexual orientation, civil rights, religious liberty, discrimination

Suggested Citation

Velte, Kyle, Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (September 22, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3041377 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041377

Kyle Velte (Contact Author)

University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )

1535 W 15th Street
Room 504
Lawrence, KS 66045
United States
785-864-3577 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
rank
202,075
Abstract Views
712
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information