Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9 (formerly Giordano Alpi and others v. Argentine Republic), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 2 February 2013 (Bruno Simma and Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel) and Dissent Santiago Torres Bernárdez, 2 May 2013

15 Journal of World Investment and Trade 314 (2014)

12 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2017

Date Written: September 1, 2014

Abstract

This case note summarizes and analyzes the first jurisdictional decision in an investment treaty arbitration brought by a large number of claimants. The case was brought against Argentina and arose out of its default on its sovereign bonds.

Keywords: Mass-Claims Arbitration, BITs, Argentina, Sovereign Default, Sovereign Bonds, Sovereign Debt, Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Suggested Citation

Blanchard, Sadie, Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and others v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9 (formerly Giordano Alpi and others v. Argentine Republic), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 2 February 2013 (Bruno Simma and Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel) and Dissent Santiago Torres Bernárdez, 2 May 2013 (September 1, 2014). 15 Journal of World Investment and Trade 314 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3041928

Sadie Blanchard (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
Abstract Views
605
Rank
373,523
PlumX Metrics