All Individuals May Be Made Worse Off Under Any Nonwelfarist Principle
23 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2002
Date Written: February 2002
Abstract
Nonwelfarist principles - notably, deontological principles - are often advanced to guide moral decisions. The types of choices addressed by such principles typically seem, on their face, to involve conflicts of interests among individuals. Nevertheless, it can be demonstrated that any nonwelfarist principle will, in some circumstances, favor choices that make all individuals worse off. For a variety of reasons, this conclusion has important implications for moral theories that are understood to support nonwelfarist principles.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Analysis of Welfare Economics, Morality and the Law
-
Any Non-Welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: Reply
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Moral Rules and the Moral Sentiments: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Moral Rules and the Moral Sentiments: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Fairness Versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Fairness Versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Principles of Fairness Versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell