Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products

32 Pages Posted: 27 Sep 2017 Last revised: 20 Jul 2018

See all articles by Ximin (Natalie) Huang

Ximin (Natalie) Huang

University of Minnesota

Atalay Atasu

Georgia Institute of Technology - Sustainability

L. Beril Toktay

Georgia Institute of Technology - Sustainability

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 17, 2018

Abstract

We analyze product design implications of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)-based take-back legislation on durable goods. In particular, we observe that durable product design incentives under EPR may involve an inherent trade-off that has not been explored to date: Durable goods producers can respond to EPR by making their products more recyclable or more durable, where the former decreases the unit recycling cost and the latter reduces the volume the producer has to recycle. When these two design attributes do not go hand-in-hand, as is the case for many product categories, product design implications of EPR can be counterintuitive. We nd that more stringent collection targets (defined as the portion of total product volume to be collected) or recycling targets (defined as the portion of each collected product unit to be recycled) may imply reduced recyclability or durability. Moreover, although collection and recycling targets appear to be similar EPR implementation levers for increasing the total amount of materials recycled, they in fact have opposing e ects in driving producers' design choices. As a result, EPR may have unintended consequences for the environment. A calibrated numerical study on the Photovoltaic Panel (PVP) industry allows us to show that more stringent EPR requirements (such as those proposed by the recent recast of the WEEE Directive) can lead to a PVP technology choice with lower recyclability and higher durability, and consequently result in higher greenhouse gas emissions. These results call for a careful analysis of the benefits of EPR legislation in the context of durable goods.

Keywords: Durability, Recyclability, Take-Back Legislation, Extended Producer Responsibility

Suggested Citation

Huang, Ximin (Natalie) and Atasu, Atalay and Toktay, L. Beril, Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products (January 17, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3043985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3043985

Ximin (Natalie) Huang (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota ( email )

19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Atalay Atasu

Georgia Institute of Technology - Sustainability ( email )

800 West Peachtree St.
Atlanta, GA 30308
United States

L. Beril Toktay

Georgia Institute of Technology - Sustainability ( email )

800 West Peachtree St.
Atlanta, GA 30308
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
792
rank
128,530
PlumX Metrics