First Principles First: International Relations Theory and the Debate Over U.S. Grand Strategy

46 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2017

See all articles by Paul C. Avey

Paul C. Avey

University of Notre Dame

Jonathan Markowitz

University of Southern California

Robert Reardon

Independent

Date Written: May 1, 2017

Abstract

More than a quarter century after the end of the Cold War, the debate continues on the appropriate American grand strategy to succeed containment. Despite widespread consensus on American core interests, there is little progress on what specific policy objectives and tools will maximize those interests. We argue that the lack of progress to date stems from a more basic disagreement about how the world works. Specifically, different groups within the debate rely on differing international relations theories: liberalism and realism. Those theories inform beliefs regarding how far away the United States is from an “optimal strategy,” or, alternatively, how best to reach the Pareto frontier, given American interests. We demonstrate that this framework can best identify competing schools of grand strategy, where and why they disagree, and the degree to which those disagreements can be resolved through empirical tests. In this way, our paper both maps and presents ways to advance the current debate regarding U.S. grand strategy.

Suggested Citation

Avey, Paul C. and Markowitz, Jonathan and Reardon, Robert, First Principles First: International Relations Theory and the Debate Over U.S. Grand Strategy (May 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3045466 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3045466

Paul C. Avey

University of Notre Dame ( email )

361 Mendoza College of Business
Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646
United States

Jonathan Markowitz (Contact Author)

University of Southern California ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Robert Reardon

Independent

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
166
PlumX Metrics