Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Regulating Fear, Not Risk

64 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2017

See all articles by Ann Schiavone

Ann Schiavone

Duquesne University School of Law

Date Written: September 1, 2015


Beginning in the 1980s, the curious phenomenon of breed-specific legislation (BSL) began to spread across the U.S. and abroad. The phenomenon can be traced to sensationalistic media portrayals of the pit bull at that time. This kind of sensationalism was nothing new; throughout American history, various breeds have served as scapegoats, each taking a turn as the most ‘dangerous.’ While it was not new to seek to contain fears by isolating a particular ‘problem’ breed, the legislation itself was unprecedented. Today, in light of mounting evidence that factors other than breed are more determinative of aggression in domestic dogs and that BSL does not decrease incidents of dog bites, many jurisdictions are seeking to undo these laws. For example, many states have passed legislation preempting local ordinances that discriminate based on breed. This article calls for all jurisdictions to follow suit, in recognition of the fact that there are more rational methods available for addressing the public health hazard posed by individual aggressive dogs.

Keywords: animal law, pet law, dog aw, canine breed-specific laws, behavioral psychology, canine biology, decision-making, legislation

Suggested Citation

Schiavone, Ann, Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Regulating Fear, Not Risk (September 1, 2015). Animal Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2015, Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper No. 2017-06, Available at SSRN:

Ann Schiavone (Contact Author)

Duquesne University School of Law ( email )

600 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15282
United States
412-396-2117 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics