Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

From No Child Left Behind to Every Student Succeeds: Back to a Future for Education Federalism

38 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2017 Last revised: 2 Nov 2017

Michael Heise

Cornell Law School

Date Written: October 4, 2017


When passed in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act represented the federal government’s most dramatic foray into the elementary and secondary public school policymaking terrain. While critics emphasized the Act’s overreliance on standardized testing and its reduced school-district and state autonomy, proponents lauded the Act’s goal to close the achievement gap between middle- and upper-middle-class students and students historically ill served by their schools. Whatever structural changes the No Child Left Behind Act achieved, however, were largely undone in 2015 by the Every Student Succeeds Act, which repositioned significant federal education policy control in state governments. From a federalism standpoint, the Every Student Succeeds Act may have reset education federalism boundaries to favor states, far exceeding their position prior to 2001.

While federal elementary and secondary education reform efforts since 2001 may intrigue legal scholars, a focus on educational federalism risks obscuring an even more fundamental development in educational policymaking power: its migration from governments to families, from regulation to markets. Amid a multidecade squabble between federal and state lawmakers over education policy authority, efforts to harness individual autonomy and market forces in the service of increasing children’s educational opportunity and equity have grown. Persistent demands for and increased availability of school voucher programs, charter schools, tax credits programs, and home schooling demonstrate families’ desire for greater agency over decisions about their children’s education. Parents’ calls for greater control over critical decisions concerning their children’s education and schooling options may eclipse state and federal lawmakers’ legislative squabbles over educational federalism.

Keywords: elementary, secondary, education, federal, state, lawmakers, standardized testing, autonomy, No Child Left Behind Act, Every Student Succeeds Act, education policy, regulation, school voucher, tax credits, charter schools, home schooling, parental control, legislation, Congress, NCLB

Suggested Citation

Heise, Michael, From No Child Left Behind to Every Student Succeeds: Back to a Future for Education Federalism (October 4, 2017). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-46. Available at SSRN:

Michael Heise (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

310 Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
607-255-0069 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Abstract Views