Shared Space and Slow Science

Forthcoming in Von Schomberg (ed.) Handbook of responsible research and innovation, Edward Elgar

13 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2017

Date Written: October 1, 2016

Abstract

In this chapter, I use the idea of ‘shared space’ as an analogy for the responsible governance of a controversial emerging area of science: geoengineering. I begin by sketching a conventional history of geoengineering ideas, before complicating this narrative to suggest that the conventional distribution of responsibility between climate understanding and climate control cannot be drawn as easily as is often assumed. I then consider the contested nature of geoengineering experiments as a site for the negotiation of responsibility. Despite attempts to delineate safe spaces for experimentation, the governance of these experiments has been unable to escape the broader politics of geoengineering. Finally, extending the metaphor of shared space as a governance alternative, I discuss the merits of ‘slow science’. My argument is that, while slowness seems almost heretical in science policy discourse, it is both normatively attractive as well as being a reasonable description of the unfolding of geoengineering research.

Keywords: governance, geoengineering, responsible innovation

Suggested Citation

Stilgoe, Jack, Shared Space and Slow Science (October 1, 2016). Forthcoming in Von Schomberg (ed.) Handbook of responsible research and innovation, Edward Elgar . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048409

Jack Stilgoe (Contact Author)

University College London ( email )

Gower Street
London, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
245
PlumX Metrics