Due Process is Not Optional: Mississippi Conservatorship Proceedings Fall Short on Basic Due Process Protections for Elderly and Disabled Adults

62 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2017 Last revised: 14 Oct 2017

See all articles by Desiree Hensley

Desiree Hensley

University of Mississippi - School of Law

Date Written: June 1, 2017

Abstract

The basic civil rights of elderly and disabled adults are at risk of being violated by the very state court procedures that are supposed to protect these adults from abuse and neglect. Modifications of Mississippi law, including the adoption of a clear evidentiary standard, minimum notice and pleading requirements, separate consideration of the protections needed for financial management and personal decision making, and requiring the use of less restrictive alternatives than full appointments can achieve the dual goals of protecting vulnerable adults from abuse and neglect and protecting their fundamental civil rights.

Keywords: civil rights, elderly, disabled, abuse, neglect, protective proceedings, guardianship, conservatorship, clear and convincing, evidence, pleading, notice, decision making, decisionmaking, decision-making, less restrictive alternatives, supported decision making, vulnerable adult, court, procedures

Suggested Citation

Hensley, Desiree, Due Process is Not Optional: Mississippi Conservatorship Proceedings Fall Short on Basic Due Process Protections for Elderly and Disabled Adults (June 1, 2017). Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3048883

Desiree Hensley (Contact Author)

University of Mississippi - School of Law ( email )

Lamar Law Center
P.O. Box 1848
University, MS 38677
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
305
PlumX Metrics