Dissing States?: Invalidation of State Action During the Rehnquist Era

77 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2002  

Ruth Colker

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

Kevin M. Scott

United States Department of Justice

Abstract

The "federalism revolution" under Chief Justice Rehnquist's leadership has been the subject of considerable discussion with some legal commentators suggesting that the Court has invalidated federal action in order to protect state sovereignty. By contrast, political scientists routinely argue that ideology rather than federalism can best explain the voting behavior of Supreme Court Justices. Neither of these arguments has involved close examination of the Rehnquist Court's record with respect to invalidating state action.

In this article, Ruth Colker and Kevin Scott use quantitative and qualitative analysis to ask what factors predict a vote to invalidate state action during the Rehnquist era for individual Justices, paying particular attention to the federalists. They find that conservative ideology as well as some criteria for federalism can help explain the invalidation results for Justices Rehnquist and Thomas and, to a lesser extent, Scalia. But they also find that Justices O'Connor and Kennedy do not fit the pattern found for the other federalists. In fact, they find that four different versions of "federalism" explain the voting behavior of the federalists on the Rehnquist Court.

Colker and Scott's data do not support the argument expressed by some political scientists that federalism plays virtually no role in explaining the voting behavior of the Supreme Court. Their data, however, do support the argument that the labels -- activist, conservative, and federalist -- best describe the legacy of the Rehnquist Court in considering its pattern of invalidating state action. Law is not only politics, but acting consistently with a conservative ideology is an important predictor of the voting behavior of the core federalists on the Rehnquist Court.

JEL Classification: H7, K1

Suggested Citation

Colker, Ruth and Scott, Kevin M., Dissing States?: Invalidation of State Action During the Rehnquist Era. Forthcoming in Virginia Law Review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=304974

Ruth Colker (Contact Author)

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )

55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
(614) 292-0900 (Phone)
(614) 292-2035 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/faculty/professor/ruth-colker/

Kevin M. Scott

United States Department of Justice ( email )

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Rank
274,485
Abstract Views
765