Revisiting Gender Differences in Ultimatum Bargaining: Experimental Evidence from the US and China

19 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2017 Last revised: 12 Oct 2017

See all articles by Shuwen Li

Shuwen Li

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) - Antai College of Economics and Management

Xiangdong Qin

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU)

Daniel Houser

Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science

Date Written: August 21, 2017

Abstract

We report results from a replication of Solnick (2001), which finds using an ultimatum game that, in relation to males, more is demanded from female proposers and less is offered to female responders. We conduct Solnick’s (2001) game using participants from a large US university and a large Chinese university. We find little evidence of gender differences across proposer and responder decisions in both locations. We do however find that, in comparison to Chinese participants, US proposers are more generous, while US responders are more demanding.

Keywords: Gender differences, Cultural differences, Laboratory experiment, Ultimatum game, Bargaining

JEL Classification: C78, C92, J16, Z10

Suggested Citation

Li, Shuwen and Qin, Xiangdong and Houser, Daniel, Revisiting Gender Differences in Ultimatum Bargaining: Experimental Evidence from the US and China (August 21, 2017). GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 17-34, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3050080 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3050080

Shuwen Li (Contact Author)

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU) - Antai College of Economics and Management

1954 Huashan Road
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai 200030
China

Xiangdong Qin

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU)

KoGuan Law School
Shanghai 200030, Shanghai 200052
China

Daniel Houser

Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science ( email )

5th Floor, Vernon Smith Hall
George Mason University
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
7039934856 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dhouser/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
108
Abstract Views
921
Rank
500,618
PlumX Metrics