Subsidizing the Stork: New Evidence on Tax Incentives and Fertility
66 Pages Posted: 23 Mar 2002 Last revised: 3 Sep 2022
Date Written: March 2002
Abstract
Variation in tax policy presents an opportunity to estimate the responsiveness of fertility to prices. This paper exploits the introduction of a pro-natalist transfer policy in the Canadian province of Quebec that paid up to C$8,000 to families having a child. I implement a quasi-experimental strategy by forming treatment and control groups defined by time, jurisdiction, and family type. This permits a triple-difference estimator to be implemented -- both on the program's introduction and cancellation. Furthermore, the incentive was available broadly, rather than to a narrow subset of the population as studied in the literature on AFDC and fertility. This provides a unique opportunity to investigate heterogeneous responses. I find a strong effect of the policy on fertility, and some evidence of a heterogeneous response that may help reconcile these results with the AFDC literature.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Is There an Effect of Incremental Welfare Benefits on Fertility Behavior? A Look at the Family Cap
-
Fertility and Financial Incentives in France
By Guy Laroque and Bernard Salanie
-
Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return-to-Work? Evidence from a True Natural Experiment
By Rafael Lalive and Josef Zweimüller
-
Fertility, Female Labor Supply and Public Policy
By Patricia F. Apps and Ray Rees
-
Does Fertility Respond to Financial Incentives?
By Guy Laroque and Bernard Salanie
-
Does Fertility Respond to Financial Incentives?
By Guy Laroque and Bernard Salanie
-
Welfare Reform and Non-Marital Fertility in the 1990s: Evidence from Birth Records
By Theodore Joyce, Robert Kaestner, ...
-
Do Financial Incentives Affect Fertility?
By Alma Cohen, Rajeev H. Dehejia, ...