Anti-Inversion Regulation Invalidated in Federal Court

4 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2017

See all articles by Elizabeth Chorvat

Elizabeth Chorvat

University of Iowa Tippie College of Business

Date Written: October 16, 2017

Abstract

Under the Supreme Court’s Mayo decision, legislative and interpretive regulations are accorded Chevron deference if they comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) notice and comment requirements. In Chamber of Commerce on September 29, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas extended the rule to temporary regulations, invalidating reg. section 1.7874-8T, the so-called multiple acquisition rule, for failure to comply with the notice and comment procedures under the APA. Reg. section 1.7874-8T was issued as part of the 2016 temporary regulations designed to limit the U.S. tax benefits following an inversion. Persuaded by the fact that section 7805(e) does not expressly exempt temporary regulations from the APA’s notice and comment requirement, the district court held that the temporary nature of the regulation did not excuse Treasury from the notice and comment procedures required by the APA.

Suggested Citation

Chorvat, Elizabeth, Anti-Inversion Regulation Invalidated in Federal Court (October 16, 2017). Tax Notes, October 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054213

Elizabeth Chorvat (Contact Author)

University of Iowa Tippie College of Business ( email )

W272 Pappajohn Business Building
21 East Market Street
Iowa City, IA 52242
(319) 467-0528 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
1,036
rank
415,153
PlumX Metrics