Replacing the Failure Rate: A Downside Risk Perspective

Posted: 21 May 2019

Date Written: October 18, 2017

Abstract

The evaluation of retirement strategies is typically based on the failure rate, although some alternatives have been proposed recently, such as risk-adjusted success (RAS), which aims to capture not just the failure but also the success of the strategies evaluated. The main shortcoming of RAS is that it measures risk with the standard deviation, which penalizes strategies that leave large bequests. The variable proposed here, downside risk-adjusted success (D-RAS), addresses this shortcoming by taking a downside risk perspective, measuring risk with the semideviation, and therefore with volatility below a chosen benchmark. This modification leads to the selection of more plausible strategies than those selected by both the failure rate and RAS.

Keywords: Retirement strategies; failure rate; risk-adjusted success; downside risk

JEL Classification: G11

Suggested Citation

Estrada, Javier, Replacing the Failure Rate: A Downside Risk Perspective (October 18, 2017). https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2018.5.4.046. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3055014 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3055014

Javier Estrada (Contact Author)

IESE Business School ( email )

IESE Business School
Av. Pearson 21
Barcelona, 08034
Spain
+34 93 253 4200 (Phone)
+34 93 253 4343 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
791
PlumX Metrics