Canada's Progressive Trade Agenda and the NAFTA Renegotiation

24 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2017 Last revised: 5 May 2018

See all articles by Dan Ciuriak

Dan Ciuriak

Ciuriak Consulting Inc.; Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI); C.D. Howe Institute; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada; BKP Development Research & Consulting GmbH

Date Written: April 29, 2018

Abstract

Canada is developing a progressive trade agenda (PTA) that is pitched as a response to the rise of anti-globalization populism. This note reviews the concept of the PTA, its motivation, the specific elements that comprise it, the likely efficacy of these measures in addressing the factors thought to be driving populism, and the extent to which it can shape Canada’s trade agreements in general and the renegotiated NAFTA in particular. It concludes that the PTA closely parallels the concept of “inclusive trade”, which has received much attention internationally including in the WTO, the G20, and the World Economic Forum, and the concept of “trade sustainability” that has been developed by the European Union; that it responds to a widely accepted view that the gains from globalization have not been fairly shared, that there have been losers as well as winners, and that this has been a factor fueling the populist reaction against globalization; and that, while the policy is coherently framed, the role that trade policy has played in generating the current backlash against globalization was arguably relatively small, and the traction the PTA would have addressing these issues would be commensurately small. Further, the PTA faces modality issues: the norm-setting aspect is most effectively pursued at the multilateral level; in bilateral negotiations, policy coherence issues arise with both new and existing FTA partners, depending on the progressive credentials of partner governments (and changing administrations); and limiting the substantive content of the PTA to carve-outs for Canada’s own progressive initiatives in order to achieve some elements even with less progressive trade partners may result in Canada facing competitive disadvantage and also a difficult time mobilizing support for the agreement. Finally, since deep integration requires relatively strong commitments in the areas addressed by the PTA, a failure to get the PTA through in the NAFTA renegotiation would signal that the move to deeper integration on the North American continent is truly over, with profound implications for commitments on behind-the-border measures in general.

Keywords: Progressive Trade Agenda, NAFTA, Canada, United States, Mexico, Anti-Globalization, Populism

JEL Classification: F13, F16, F18, F60

Suggested Citation

Ciuriak, Dan, Canada's Progressive Trade Agenda and the NAFTA Renegotiation (April 29, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3055948 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3055948

Dan Ciuriak (Contact Author)

Ciuriak Consulting Inc. ( email )

83 Stewart St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6H9
Canada

Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) ( email )

57 Erb Street West
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2
Canada

C.D. Howe Institute ( email )

67 Yonge St., Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario M5E 1J8
Canada

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada ( email )

Canada

HOME PAGE: http://ciuriakconsulting.com/

BKP Development Research & Consulting GmbH ( email )

Romanstrasse 74
München, 80639
Germany

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
Abstract Views
733
rank
216,941
PlumX Metrics