Were Compulsory and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939

Posted: 10 Jun 2002

See all articles by Adriana Lleras-Muney

Adriana Lleras-Muney

Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Abstract

Were compulsory attendance and child labor laws responsible for the incredible growth in secondary schooling from 1915 to 1939? Using 1960 census data, I find that legally requiring a child to attend school for one more year, either by increasing the age required for a work permit or by lowering the entrance age, increased educational attainment by 5%. The effect was similar for white males and females, but there was no effect for blacks. Continuation school laws requiring working children to attend school on a part-time basis were effective for white males only. These laws increased the education only of those in the lower percentiles of the education distribution, thereby decreasing education inequality, perhaps by as much as 15%. States with higher wealth, higher percentage of immigrants or lower percentage of blacks were more likely to pass stringent laws. The results also suggest that these laws were not endogenous.

Suggested Citation

Lleras-Muney, Adriana, Were Compulsory and Child Labor Laws Effective? An Analysis from 1915 to 1939. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=305706

Adriana Lleras-Muney (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs ( email )

Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
534
PlumX Metrics