Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Recent Developments in Korean Antirust Cases Concerning FRAND-Encumbered Standard-Essential Patents

Jindal Global Law Review, Vol. 8: 221, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s41020-017-0051-1

14 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2017 Last revised: 3 Dec 2017

Jinyul Ju

Pusan National University

Date Written: July 30, 2017

Abstract

In Korea, there have been four antitrust cases concerning the “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory” (FRAND) related standard-essential patents (SEPs) in the last six years: (1) Seoul Central District Court’s decision in Samsung v. Apple (August 2012); (2) Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC)’s consent decision on Microsoft’s acquisition of Nokia (August 2015); (3) Seoul High Court’s decision in Qualcomm v. KFTC (August 2012) pending in the Supreme Court; and (4) KFTC’s decision against Qualcomm (January 2017) pending in the Seoul High Court.

This article provides an analyses of the four cases, and comments on the application of the Korean Monopoly and Fair Trade Act towards FRAND-encumbered SEPs.

Keywords: Antitrust, Competition, Korea, FRAND, SEP, Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, Microsoft

JEL Classification: K21

Suggested Citation

Ju, Jinyul, Recent Developments in Korean Antirust Cases Concerning FRAND-Encumbered Standard-Essential Patents (July 30, 2017). Jindal Global Law Review, Vol. 8: 221, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s41020-017-0051-1 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3057341

Jinyul Ju (Contact Author)

Pusan National University ( email )

School of Law
Geumjeong-gu
Busan, 46241
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
80