Recent Developments in Korean Antirust Cases Concerning FRAND-Encumbered Standard-Essential Patents

Jindal Global Law Review, Vol. 8: 221, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s41020-017-0051-1

14 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2017 Last revised: 26 Oct 2020

See all articles by Jinyul Ju

Jinyul Ju

Pusan National University (Korea)

Date Written: July 30, 2017

Abstract

In Korea, there have been four antitrust cases concerning the “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory” (FRAND) related standard-essential patents (SEPs) in the last six years: (1) Seoul Central District Court’s decision in Samsung v. Apple (August 2012); (2) Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC)’s consent decision on Microsoft’s acquisition of Nokia (August 2015); (3) Seoul High Court’s decision in Qualcomm v. KFTC (August 2012) pending in the Supreme Court; and (4) KFTC’s decision against Qualcomm (January 2017) pending in the Seoul High Court. This article addressed those cases, as well as some issues of Korean competition law in dealing with FRAND-encumbered SEPs.

Keywords: Antitrust, Competition, Korea, FRAND, SEP, Apple, Samsung, Qualcomm, Microsoft

JEL Classification: K21

Suggested Citation

Ju, Jinyul, Recent Developments in Korean Antirust Cases Concerning FRAND-Encumbered Standard-Essential Patents (July 30, 2017). Jindal Global Law Review, Vol. 8: 221, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s41020-017-0051-1 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3057341 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057341

Jinyul Ju (Contact Author)

Pusan National University (Korea) ( email )

Law School
Geumjeong-gu
Busan, 46241
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
176
Abstract Views
1,116
Rank
355,976
PlumX Metrics